Batman: the Movie (1966)

MV5BODVjNjdlYTQtMWIwYy00MWIyLWI2ZmMtZWFhMTdjNjAzNGVlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTAyNDQ2NjI@._V1_

“Of what use is a dream, if not a blueprint for courageous action?”
-Adam West, Batman: the Movie

 

 

Today I woke up to a typical Saturday morning of coffee without sugar and chasing my toddler around the house, blissfully unaware that an icon was gone. I was not confronted with the sad news until I checked my Twitter account: Adam West had passed away at the age of 88. Mr. West will be fondly remembered for his role as Batman, perhaps most warmly remembered of all the men who have played the role.

To clarify my own history with West’s rendition of Batman, I was born in the mid-80’s so I missed the Bat-craze of the 60’s. I saw snippets of the show as a child but by then it was too antiquated to really catch my eye. It wasn’t until I revisited the series with any semblance of seriousness as an adult, after having endeared myself to Batman via the animated series of the 90’s and Batman ’89, that Adam West’s self-described “Bright Knight” hit home with me. A wealth of history opened up to me. This is a forever isolated portrayal of Batman and entirely distinct from the brooding, hulking, ultra-violent versions of the character we’ve come to know in modernity.

66cb9488a11fbcb841609a324dbd8010.jpg

Yet looking back from the vantage point of the 21st century, I can appreciate West’s Batman. There’s more to the impact of this Batman than the odd “Pow! Zap! Bang!” that’s become a cheesy referential mainstay. West’s contributions to the character through the Batman TV show of the 1960’s, and the subsequent legendary personality he achieved despite never having landed another part as big again, ensured that his Batman became foundational for our current interpretations of the Dark Knight. How so?

Consider how influential 60’s Batman was, a virtuous, innocent, hilarious, lighthearted, tongue-in-cheek take on the character that impacted a generation. It’s been said that 1960’s pop culture could be defined by the three B’s: James Bond, the Beatles, and Batman. But the backlash against the campiness of 60’s Batman has helped define him since.

Would we even have had the dramatic course correction in the character’s film history had we never experienced the chemical-colored “Kapow!” of 60’s Batman? Would Tim Burton’s Batman ’89 have felt so fresh and edgy at the time without the brightness of 60’s Batman to contrast against? Would Schumacher’s neon-tinted Batman movies have been so off-putting if they hadn’t felt like a return to 60’s camp? Would DC’s crown jewel character have continued to evolve toward seriousness, realism, and gritty darkness in Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy without 60’s Batman in the back of everyone’s minds saying “never again”? Would we even be talking about whether Affleck’s tortured Batman in BvS went too far, crossed a line and was too violent if there was no 60’s Batman to remind us how far we’ve gone?

02.jpg

The rampant cynicism of today gave us these versions of Batman but Adam West led a lighthearted series that grins with its audiences, a series which is still remarkably funny in its own way. West’s Batman was a deputized agent of the law, not a vigilante. West’s Batman believed in the police force, never fighting against corruption within their ranks. West’s Batman championed abstaining from alcohol, wearing seat belts, and finishing your homework, not sleeping with supermodels and knocking out on liquor and sleeping pills. West’s Batman believed in a better world where leaders could come together and make peace, not a world where the war against crime would be endless. You could hardly believe that West’s Batman was once a tormented boy who lost his parents!

Perhaps it could be argued that Batman’s history in film would’ve played out somewhat the same thanks to the direction the character was heading in the comics since the end of the Silver Age, but it can never be denied that West’s Batman represents an entire era. Love it or hate it, 60’s Batman camp is as much a part of the interpretive progress of the Dark Knight as anything else in his history. You don’t have to enjoy it, but it deserves your respect for its influence if you’re a Batman fan. It’s significance cannot be overstated as the first appearance of the Caped Crusader on the silver screen (not counting serials).

So in light of Adam West’s passing, we’re hopping in a time machine and headed back to the dance-party, fun-loving, crazy 60’s for a look at Batman: the Movie, or as I like to call it: Batman ’66.

86ae1c421d7cf0392c3ba6fc71aa3f2e

“I have the curse of thinking funny! And so with each script and new situation, I saw something funny in it. But I could never let the audience think that I thought it was funny.”
-Adam West

Coming on the heels of the overwhelming success of the TV series, the movie debuted shortly after the end of Batman’s first season. The first guarantee of its consistency with the TV show was bringing in series writer Lorenzo Semple Jr. as the writer of the film. The premise was bringing together the four main villains of the series to make a bigger story than ever. The movie was also directed by Leslie H. Martinson, who directed two episodes from season one. Translating the series to the big screen with this production team was only half of the victory, though. The entire cast (minus one) returned to reprise their roles for the movie.

716efc681e2ea923b8358b08b2c6adac.jpg

West of course came through as the Caped Crusader. Nobody else could have nailed this role. West’s unusual rhythm of speech and whispery-pensive delivery made his Batman entirely unique. The blu-ray contains behind the scenes test footage of another actor (Lyle Waggoner) playing the part and there’s just something missing. West was able to say his ridiculous dialogue with such earnestness, wistfulness, and believability that it makes his Batman all the funnier. Though Batman never joked, he comes across as if he’s self-aware that he’s playing a part in a silly movie. When he says things like “It was noble of that animal to hurl himself into the path of that final torpedo. He gave his life for ours”, it’s like West is winking at you without actually winking. Endearingly, he made you feel like you were in on the joke.

And the movie is funny, but in a unique way. It’s not slapstick or stand up. It’s certainly not black humor. While the heroes are all playing puns like some straight-faced police series, the villains are pouring their energy into their roles and maniacal laughter, and the writing just keeps laying it on thick, amazing alliteration after alliteration.

multimedia

“I think our Batman had to be fun, light-hearted, funny, tongue-in-cheek … and I think that made kind of an homage to those earlier comic books, where Batman always had a quip or something. Now if I were doing it today, I’d make changes, but I wouldn’t make it as violent, as loud, as noisy, with the explosives going on and on … the crashes … as what they’re doing now to try and titillate a younger, teenage audience. I wouldn’t do that. I’d just make the relationships more important.”
-Adam West

Is it the best Batman movie ever? Not by a long shot. I’d say it’s better than Schumacher’s Batman and Robin, so it doesn’t take the prize as the worst Bat-film there is. Comparing the two, for example, Batman ’66 is like a cartoon full of actors being serious whereas Batman and Robin is a bunch of actors pretending they’re in a cartoon. The difference is palpable and it’s part of what made the self-satire of Batman ’66 lovable rather than eye-rolling, as in the case of Batman and Robin, the film that killed the Bat-film franchise for eight years.

These are the top five funniest moments in Batman ’66, in my opinion.

  1. Solving the riddles
    “What does a turkey do when he flies upside down?” Well of course the answer is “He gobbles up!” “What has yellow skin and writes?” “A ballpoint banana!” Obviously. The leaps of intuition that Robin the boy wonder makes solving these schoolkid riddles are one of the best parts of the movie.batman-66-winner-best-shot.jpg
  2. The domino masks
    There’s a scene where Robin and Alfred are tailing Bruce Wayne for reconnaissance and for some reason, Alfred is wearing a domino mask. Later, the villains capture Mr. Wayne during a steamy scene with Ms. Kitka and when they jump through the window they’re all wearing masks too… Why?! As if anyone could mistake the Joker’s white makeup painted right over his mustache.screenshot-lrg-13.png
  3. Punching the shark
    I can’t watch this movie without laughing and the titters and guffaws start right away in one of the earliest scenes with Batman dangling from a ladder over the ocean, punching a rubber shark fastened to his leg. When he calls for Robin to bring him the “shark repellent bat-spray”, as if his life depended on it, you know that you’ve never seen another Batman like this.batman-shark.gif
  4. “Some days you just can’t rid of a bomb!”
    What film would be brave enough to waste this much time? Batman runs across the docks, smoking bomb held above his head, looking for a safe space to toss it before it blows up. Only problem is there are nuns and baby carriages, ducklings and that one marching band everywhere he turns. That’s when he delivers the best line in the movie.batman66bomb.gif
  5. West’s straight-faced and bizarre line deliveries
    Kind of like Christopher Walken, Adam West had this almost sing-songy pace to his speech. On occasion, he punctuated every word. Like I mentioned before, he was uniquely made for this role.n0kWf-1459363350-embed-batman_set_cowl.jpg

Batman ’66 is best watched with a group of friends in a good mood. It makes good moods gooder. It’s paced slowly enough to talk over, it isn’t ashamed in becoming the butt of any joke, it’s got that cool 1960’s Batmobile, and it’s as hilarious as “a sparrow with a machine gun”.

 

 

The 8-bit Review
visual Visuals: 
8/10
This score is judging the film primarily in the context of its own decade, as it’s clearly lackluster and ancient compared to the special effects we regularly see in film today. I wonder what it must have been like to live in the era of the dawn of color television. Batman ’66 was marketed on the inclusion of color. For many, seeing the film in the theater meant seeing the Dynamic Duo’s adventures in color for the first time. In retrospect, I can’t imagine how anyone could appreciate the film or the series in black and white. The movie relies on explosive colors vividly dancing and streaking across the screen.

MV5BMjMwZGJjMzktMzMyNS00Mzk3LTg3ZDUtZGZjYmQ3NWFkNzY3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTAyNDQ2NjI@._V1_

Another unique trait of the movie, and one which I tried to uncover if the film had pioneered or not, is the skewed camera angle that the cinematographer employed. During the movie, there are plenty of scenes where the camera is looking straight at the set and characters. In other scenes, most notably with the villains, the camera is tilted on its side, skewing the whole picture, making the moviegoer feel strange or uneasy while at the same time evoking dramatic panels of art ripped straight from the comic books.

Yeah the special effects don’t hold up to modern standards but that’s not the point. Stylish pop art and primary colors ooze from this movie and the action words leaping off the screen when Batman throws a punch, “Kapow!”, are just icing on the sugary, sugary cake.

49ee71efd6b037806d8e6f6a899beda1.jpg

 Audio: 6/10
Very few things have permeated our culture as much as the “Batman theme song” from the TV series. Does anyone not know this song? If you start singing nana-nana-nana-nana, what are the odds that someone will immediately respond by shouting “Batman!” The theme song doesn’t feature hugely into the movie but you can tell that the jazzy soundtrack is influenced by it.

 

story Narrative: 5/10
After the Dynamic Duo discover a missing yacht, they and the police come to the conclusion that a plan of such magnitude is unfolding that can only be attributed to four villains: the Joker, the Riddler, the Penguin, and the Catwoman. These criminals of the United Underworld have captured Commodore Schmidlapp and they wield a variety of bizarre gadgets (an exploding octopus, a penguin submarine, a dehydration gun, etc.) to terrorize and take down Batman and Robin for good.

After some hijinks that feels suspiciously episodic, the Dynamic Duo uncover their foes’ master plan to dehydrate the United World Organization’s Security Council members and take over the world. Only by keeping their wits about them do Batman and Robin defeat the villains and restore the council members, though each of the world leaders now speaks a non-native language. Batman hopes that this will somehow help to bring a new understanding of one another to the world, and thus the day is saved and hope prevails.

MBDBATM EC006

It’s a silly story that makes for some passive entertainment, though it’s somewhat boring now and then. In a lot of ways, moments from the film parody comic book clichés of the time before it. The Dynamic Duo are often saved through sheer luck. The film doesn’t shy from Deus ex machinas. Everything from a dolphin saving their lives to crash landing on a foam rubber sale yard occurs without a second glance. While these and other tropes like the cackling, plotting villains fondly represent a bygone era in comics, the film can’t stand on that alone. The story is perhaps the weakest part of the movie but this can be forgiven considering the nature of the TV show and the fact that it never aimed to be some self-serious drama or crime thriller or romance. It pokes fun at those things. It’s one of the stupidest superhero movies out there and it seems like that’s exactly what it set out to be.

arctth

message Themes: 6/10
Batman ’66 puts the hope of the world in our leaders. Batman goes to great lengths to save the dehydrated council members, saying “there’s always hope”, by which he means for world peace. Though “world peace” feels today like a pipe dream, a child’s fantasy, the Bright Knight was one to tout it like his life’s work. This is a very black and white Batman. When he discovers that Ms. Kitka is actually the devious Catwoman, he realizes they cannot be together romantically. His world is too law and order, good vs evil.

This depiction of the character has faded over time as the grays of postmodern relativism ate away at the Dark Knight’s unswaying sense of traditional virtue. And that’s why we have superheroes today that can act very much like pseudo-villains. We call them “flawed heroes”, “anti-heroes”. There’s no difference in merit between 60’s Batman and 2010’s Batman so far as storytelling is concerned but it is clear that the world seems to crave darker heroes these days. It has been said that superheroes reflect the times. They always have, through the war era, through the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s, on into the cynical 21st century, into deconstructionism, into subjectivism. This is the same character, but West’s Batman is dramatically different from Keaton’s, Bale’s, and Affleck’s. Of them all, West’s exemplified goodness in a way none of the others have.

All of the silliness and camp aside, it’s no wonder that so many said of Adam West “You were MY Batman.”

DB-M4obVYAApmQb.jpg

familyfriendliness Family Friendliness: 8/10
This is easily the most kid-friendly live action version of Batman, given the statements above concerning goodness and virtue. It’s certainly the least dark and least frightening take on the character. Future Batmen were hardly role-models in comparison to West’s Caped Crusader. Brush your teeth. Eat your vegetables. Support your local law enforcement. Man, those were simpler times. I feel like I have nostalgia for Batman ’66 and I was born 20 years later!

batman-2.jpg

cast Cast: 8/10
As I mentioned, the entire main cast from the show featured in the film with the only exception being Julie Newmar who was replaced by Lee Meriwether as Catwoman.

Virtually everyone dials it up to eleven in this movie. Burt Ward as Robin is lovable and full of youthful energy. Stafford Repp is as big a buffoon as ever as Chief O’Hara and Neil Hamilton seems like he got lost and thought he was in a crime drama as Commissioner Gordon. The villainous Joker (Cesar Romero) and Riddler (Frank Gorshin) laugh so deliriously that it seems like you’re watching them explode on screen. Burgess Meredith is one of my favorite veteran actors and his raspy cackling as the Penguin is iconic.

Who cares if the Romero refused to shave his mustache for the Joker part? Seeing all these villains on screen at once, for the first and only time since, is a comic lover’s delight and I challenge you to find a movie where the actors put even more energy into roles that could easily have been dismissed by them as “for the kiddies”.

Batman_villains_The_Penguin_The_Riddler_The_Joker_1967.JPG

Yeah some of the characterizations are off compared to what we’d expect. There’s a scene where riddler can’t control his compulsions and launches a missile to give the Dynamic Duo a clue. Joker tries talking him out of giving the villains away and shouts for him to come back. When the Joker sounds like he’s yelling “Listen to reason!”, there’s something gone awry. This is again why the film probably feels like such a self-parodizing feature more than anything else and by its light one wonders why so many films take themselves so seriously today. Well, there’s no going back to camp.

tumblr_nvxij4DiOP1ref3w0o1_250.gif

Never again.

unique Uniqueness: 9/10
There’s never been another Batman like Batman ’66, nor indeed can there ever be. Even the recent hilarity of The Lego Batman Movie was a funny of another kind.

batboat

pgrade My Personal Grade: 7/10
Batman himself has proven to be one of the most enduring characters in American. Batman has been reinterpreted and reinterpreted dozens of times, and he will be a dozen more without fatigue.

I love Batman ’66 for its shameless silliness, the wit, the innocence of it all, the traditional family values. Though it’s far from the coolest version of Batman, this “pocket universe” featuring a Bright Knight instead of a Dark one is entertaining in its own way. Comic writer Mark Waid commented “…they managed to so beautifully wed the attitude of conservative, post-war America with a splash and a look and the visuals that were very hip and very now at the time.” And at the heart of all that was a man renown for his warmth.

6a010536b86d36970c017c31f91b21970b.jpg

Adam West – Sept. 19th, 1928 – June 9th, 2017

The inherent childlike humor and optimism of Batman ’66 is what makes me miss Adam West the most. In an exchange between the Dynamic Duo, West’s Batman reminds us that human beings can be good and that virtue is a rewarder of those who practice it: the good guys always and should always win. That’s Batman ’66.

Robin: “Boy! That was our closest call ever! I have to admit that I was pretty scared!”
Batman: “I wasn’t scared in the least.”
Robin: “Not at all?”
Batman: “Haven’t you noticed how we always escape the vicious ensnarements of our enemies?”
Robin: “Yeah, because we’re smarter than they are!”
Batman: “I like to think it’s because our hearts are pure.”

73b9d0c7acf92baad1ea29842556d15f

Aggregated Score: 7.1

buybutton

 

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Batman: the Movie (1966)

  1. I have super fond memories of this film and the 60s TV series, which my Dad would show me reruns of. While I love the darker toned Batman of today, it is as you said, an evolution of the character straight out of West’s time as the Caped Crusader.

    “Would Schumacher’s neon-tinted Batman movies have been so off-putting if they hadn’t felt like a return to 60’s camp?”

    I also kind of love Batman Forever for this very reason. After two harsh takes on Batman, Schumacher vision and Kilmer’s performance was a call back to my first exposure to Batman and I loved it. B&R on the other hand maybe went a little too far down the camp hole.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think Batman ’66 is going to go down as one of those nostalgia movies that many people didn’t actually grow up seeing the debut of. I’m showing it to my 1 year old and he already loves the colors and music.

      While I liked Batman ’89, I disliked Batman Returns. I like Batman Forever but really disliked Batman & Robin. In both cases, I think they let the director overwhelm the project and it just got out of control. Even the both of those films that I disliked helped to frame the interpretation of the character. I don’t suppose we’ll have a campy theatrical Batman movie for a very long time.

      Like

  2. I actually saw this movie late last year, when I was going through all the Batman movies including this one. I have actually seen the tv series when I was very young, when they were doing reruns for it. I used to love it as a kid, and even though that was a long time ago, I still remember scenes from the show.
    The movie was still a lot of fun, even though ofcourse by todays standards it might be horrible out of date. But that is just part of the charm of it as well. I had a lot of fun with it, and I agree with the five scenes that you have highlighted. The bombscene being one of the funniest scenes in my opinion: really had to laugh out loud at that 😊 I don’t know if you might have seen that film, but in 2003 Adam West returned in the movie Return to the Batcave which I also saw last year. It is not a real Batman film, but in it Adam West and Burt Ward play themselves while attempting to find out who stole the batmobile from the original show. It was a fun movie, and it had a few actors from the original series returning as well.
    It was really sad new to hear of Adam West’s passing yesterday. It always a really sad event to see one of your childhood heroes pass away. I loved your post and thought it was a fitting tribute to this great actor 😊

    Liked by 1 person

    • In preparation for Batman v Superman, a friend and I tried watching all the DC movies in chronological order. We enjoyed this one and burned ourselves out nearly on the Superman quadrilogy. Made it up to Batman Returns and I was like “forget it”. Batman ’66 is such an enjoyable movie though, especially when hanging out with friends. I pity people that can’t appreciate things just because the things are old.

      Actually I just watched that Return to the Batcave last night on someone else’s suggestion. It was pretty raunchy! haha! Glad I put my kids to bed. West and Ward together again was definitely the highlight. I was very saddened by Adam West’s passing as well. He was one of those icons that you assume are just always going to be around. I’m happy he left a huge body of work for us to continue to enjoy and share with the next generation. My oldest (1.5 years old) is already enjoying the bright colors and sounds of the Batman tv show.

      Like

  3. I watched this earlier today, too. Other things worth checking out are “Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders” (2016), which I’m sure you’ll of heard about, and “Return to the Batcave: The Misadventures of Adam & Burt” (2003), a docudrama about the making of the series told through flashbacks of the real Adam and Burt as they embark on a crime-fighting adventure of their own (I defy you to guess who the villain is).

    What I love about “Batman” (1966) is the way that the source material’s distance from reality allows for a story that is about modern political concerns. There are things in here about the Navy being irresponsible and incompetent, the importance of local policing, and the way that the world’s nations must come to understand each other if there’s to be solidarity against the united underworld. Bruce describes himself as a capitalist, but in a purely descriptive way, which isn’t a condemnation of Kitka’s Russian attitudes – like her interpretation of the Riddler as a bourgeoisie that prays on America’s workers – but as a point-of-view (which is what it is). It’s surprising that there was no controversy around the acceptance of Western and Eastern values equally, or the accusation of the film promoting communist sympathy. But that’s because it’s hidden behind something which was otherwise a cash-grab for a popular property. I feel like the filmmakers had people like us in mind, who can see beneath the surface of popular art to find the philosophy and analysis. When Batman says “Some days, you just get rid of a bomb”, it was only a joke in execution; otherwise, it’s an accurate statement that is about the way there will always be collateral casualties and innocent bystanders, no matter what measures you try to take. And yet, none of it is inconsistent with the comics of the period, and it’s still an enjoyable film to the viewers that only see that surface. It’s amazing that this even managed to work; to be a legitimate political thriller grafted onto a live-action cartoon. It deserves applause that two so opposed genres were combined but remained true to what they’re meant to be, and that nothing like it has come along again – and that for a Batman film, it remains as relevant today as the contemporary ones. They’re all about the problem of evil (Batman, I’ve often thought, is a self-appointed saviour figure), it’s just that this one responds to it more optimistically. It’s a great zeitgeist and historical document of how America felt about the world in 1966, and how little things have changed.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thanks for the thoughtful comment and the recommendations! I haven’t had the chance to watch either of those yet but the docudrama is on YouTube so I know what I’m watching tonight seeing as I have my blogging finished for the day. Thanks!

      Those are some high thoughts about the film. I think it’s fascinating how much of all those political concerns (the capitalist mention caught my ear this time around) are said and seen pretty much in passing. From the start of the film, I’d never have guessed that the Dynamic Duo would end up saving all those foreign leaders. It seems like its depth beneath the camp was the mark of great writing, which the show of course already had in Lorenzo. Comics were certainly getting deeper so it makes sense that there’s an underlying theme beneath the zaps and kapows. I’ve always thought of the movie as a kind of period piece but I’ve never taken the time to think overlong on its political undertones. That bomb analysis you mentioned is a new one by me. I find myself laughing too much during this film to think about it at all pensively but I’m already convinced that such an analysis is very much possible. Unfortunately, I don’t see myself as a political expert for such scrutiny. I’ll have to leave that to better men. Well… more interested men. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

Kindly leave a civil and decent comment like a good human being

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s